Skip to content

Should everyone be trained before launching anything?

Training everyone on a generic tool rarely achieves much. Training pays off when it starts from a concrete use in each person’s job. People learn best by doing.

Updated on 24 October 2026

What is going on.

Training all staff before launching anything seems prudent. Sessions are organised on generative AI tools, people are shown how to write a prompt, and the hope is that use will follow.

It rarely does. A few weeks later, most of it has been forgotten, for lack of a chance to use it. Useful training starts from a concrete situation in the job: the case you handle every day, the report you write every week. It also teaches people to spot when the tool is wrong, which no generic training really teaches.

What we observe.

  • Training without use fades fast.What is not practised in the following weeks is almost entirely lost.
  • Needs differ from one job to another.A lawyer, a salesperson and an accountant do not expect the same thing from AI, and do not take the same risks.
  • The best trainers are often colleagues.Those who have already built the tool into their work know how to show what works, in your company.

What you can do right now.

  1. Start by training the team involved in the first use, on that specific use.
  2. In each department, identify the people who already use AI with good judgement, and make them your relays.
  3. Keep a short session for everyone, focused on the rules: what can be given to the tool, and what must be checked.

Is this your situation?

When tools are not adopted, we first look at how they were designed, before talking about training.

Our teams work around the new tools. →

Other questions.

Is this question on your mind too? Let’s talk.

Contact us