Should we train our own model?
Almost never at the start. Existing models, used well and connected to your own knowledge, cover most needs. Training a model is justified for very specific cases, and is decided with full knowledge of the facts.
Updated on 24 October 2026
What is going on.
Training a model of your own has something reassuring about it: it would be adapted to your business, fed with your data, and belong to you alone. Some suppliers encourage the idea, and projects get started on that basis.
In the vast majority of cases, it is not necessary. Existing models can already read, write, summarise and reason. What they lack is your knowledge: your procedures, your documents, your rules. You give it to them by connecting them to your own sources, without retraining them. It is faster, cheaper, and keeps up with changes to your documents without starting over.
What we observe.
- A trained model ages quickly.General models improve every few months, and yours has to be redone to keep up.
- Training requires a lot of well-prepared data.Far more than most companies have for a given use.
- Connecting a model to your sources covers most needs.The model relies on your up-to-date documents, and you know where its answer comes from.
What you can do right now.
- Before considering training, test the use with an existing model connected to your documents.
- Note precisely what is missing from the answers you get, and what that costs.
- Only commit to training if that gap is measured, significant and lasting.