Skip to content

Are our managers ready?

Their role changes more than their teams’. They arbitrate between what AI suggests and what their experience tells them, and have to explain those decisions. Supporting them is often the most neglected part of a project.

Updated on 24 October 2026

What is going on.

AI projects often plan to train the teams who will use the tool. Managers are assumed to follow. Yet it is their role that changes the most.

They have to arbitrate between what the tool suggests and what their experience tells them, and explain those decisions to their teams. They reorganise work when some tasks disappear. They respond to worries, often without having all the answers themselves. And they remain responsible for results they now achieve with a tool they did not choose.

What we observe.

  • Managers are often the last to be told.They discover the project at the same time as their teams, yet are expected to carry it.
  • Their attitude drives adoption.A team takes ownership of a tool its manager understands and stands up for.
  • Arbitrating with AI is a new skill.Knowing when to follow a recommendation and when to depart from it cannot be improvised.

What you can do right now.

  1. Involve the managers concerned in the project before their teams, not at the same time.
  2. Give them time to talk with their peers about the trade-offs they face.
  3. Clarify what they remain responsible for when a decision relies on AI.

Is this your situation?

When tools do not take hold, we also look at how managers were involved.

Our teams work around the new tools. →

Other questions.

Is this question on your mind too? Let’s talk.

Contact us